분류 | 게시판 |
베스트 |
|
유머 |
|
이야기 |
|
이슈 |
|
생활 |
|
취미 |
|
학술 |
|
방송연예 |
|
방송프로그램 |
|
디지털 |
|
스포츠 |
|
야구팀 |
|
게임1 |
|
게임2 |
|
기타 |
|
운영 |
|
임시게시판 |
|
A.
I don't understand why the two figures concerning my existing super (in the notes column) don't add up to the $250,000 balance in the Amount column. We're a bit confused.
B. (in the notes)
$250,000
This amount is with my Retail Industry Super Fund and is the balance shown on my latest report from last June. It's and accumulation fund and I am in the 'High Growth' category. The latest report shows a taxable component of $200,000 and a non-preserved, restricted amount of $40,000. In addition, Joanne currently has $20,000 of preserved super in her capital-stable category of the Designer Industry accumulation super fund (all taxable).
A의 질문이 왜 Joanne가 최근에 가진 $20,000 수퍼는 왜 existing super에 포함되지 않느냐는 건데.
혹시 설명좀 해주실분 계신가요?
가능하다면 저 restricted amount of $40,000 도 ..
감사합니다
죄송합니다. 댓글 작성은 회원만 가능합니다.