전체 추천리스트 보기
Sotnikova knew how to rack up points in the new scoring system, so she arrived at the big event with everything she had. Kim, in contrast, skated something close to what she did to win gold in the 2010 Olympics. Across four years she hadn't expanded her game nor pushed the sport forward. Strategically, she was way behind before she even started.
Who skated better is, as always, in the eyes of the beholder. Kim was her typically elegant self. Sotnikova was too, however, and if there is ever a way for judges to err, it should always be toward the skater that tries more daring feats. Sotnikova attempted and delivered more triple jumps than Kim.
특히 이부분
김연아는 2010년 올림픽때와 비슷하게 연기했고 2010년 이후 4년동안 발전하지 못했다.
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ????????
이런 미친
[영어 공부 더할겸 댓글도 봄]
댓글은 이 기사 무진장 까네요 ㅋㅋㅋ 쉴드치는게 대부분 한국사람일거라 생각했는데
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ놀스코리아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
외국인들도 우리를 응원해주고 있었어!!
아무튼 어떻게 끝을 내야 할지 모르겠는데
요약
1. 저 저널은 김연아와 부당한 심사를 지적하는 한국을 까는 내용이다.
2. 우리를 북한이랑 헷갈려하는 사람이 다수 있지만 외국인들도 김연아에게 주어진 부당한 심사에 대해 화내고있다.
헤헿
영어짱짱맨님들 제가 캐치 못한것들 추가좀 해주셔요~
글쓰기
Dan, you're an idiot. Are you completely discounting the fact that a judge hugged Sotnikova after winning? You seem to gloss over the fact that 9 of the 15 judges were eastern-block countries. North Korea has every right to protest what most see as a travesty. Pull your very ice skating inexperienced head out of your rear and report a story about which you are well versed. Oh, sorry, that wouldn't be a very big repertoire, would it?